ThePest179

These are awful incidents of some bastards attacking innocent people, but nothing on the scale of open rioting and the burning of mosques. Also, guns won't change condition for how many people die. The conditions for murder rates in countries vary, but weapon variety does not.

89

Banned for spamming.

Granted, your hair now grows so fast it covers your entire body. I wish for the next 5 years to go by, right now.

Don't know what you mean by "riot" but after 9/11 in the US there were scores of redneck idiots roaming the country and shooting or beating up people wearing turbans, the majority of which, of course, were sikhs and not muslims at all. You seem to have a bit of a memory drop-out on that... Regards I meant like Americans acting toward Muslims like the Egyptians do to Christians. Also, if you could direct me to some sources for your claims of hicks shooting Muslims/people who looked similar (not that I deny it, I just need confirmation) I would be much obliged.

192837465

Banned for banning those who share their opinion.

Granted, you now created a major war against people who wish to secede. I wish High school was easier.

My opinion on the matter is that it's okay for assault rifles/automatic guns (such as AK-47's and Uzis respectively) to be banned, but anything beyond that is bullshit overreaction.

356727333333333700000000898888888

Granted, but now all the other SCP's exist, and join the hunt against you, and your success is running out. I wish that I never have to go through high school.

Considering that Americans didn't riot after 9/11 and that British people burned down mosques after a British soldier was beheaded, I wholeheartedly agree.

http://redbarrelsgames.com/games.html

First, Assad does indeed want to destroy Israel. All the more reason to kill him now. Second, The next government will probably be concentrated on killing off/deporting the Shias, and as a result will not be very interested in Israel for a while.

Damit, you beat me to it . So for those who are just tuning in, the US FINALLY decided to do something about Syria using chemical weapons. The problem is what kind of response the US should deliver, with the US government saying that the response should be limited (with cruise missiles attacks and bombing raids), the US public wanting no intervention whatsoever, and the Syrian Opposition groups wanting a larger intervention to topple Assad. The Syrian government warns of a retaliation against the US and Israel if a response is made. It is also of note to list Syria's allies: Hezbollah (an anti Israeli terrorist group), Iran, and Russia.

Looks like the Brotherhood has been mauled (most protesters died in the fights with the military, and top Brotherhood personnel were arrested), but it seems they wish to keep fighting, and will probably start arming their members pretty soon in order to continue their struggle.

Perhaps I was unintentionally. What thread would US war policy go then?

And there are renewed reports of the use of chemical weapons in this war. Reports indicate that around 300 people died in a major attack. What does it take for Obama to destroy those damn weapons and prevent their use by ANY group?

Granted, but now everyone is jealous of your success and wish to destroy you. I wish there were some more good fanfictions.

Banned for Deus Ex.

12345678987654321

To tell everyone else.

I never said they did know the best course of action (hence the loss of Iraq and Afghanistan). I was simply stating their opinion, wrong or not.

According to the US public, that's the last thing they want ("we don't want another war").

I'd be surprised if Israel wasn't breathing a sigh of relief right now. Two of their most dangerous adversaries (Egypt and Syria) are fighting against themselves, a third (Palestine) are cooperating in peace talks, and the fourth (Iran) is in direct conflict with the Western world.