ProHypster

I thought so, well, tax the damn industry that destroys our environment .

EMJBsoniimE With this theme, one could simply walk into Mordor. I already listened to Shostakovich and this theme before, I understand, but this is in actuallity quite anti-climatic. It always progresses into something and doesn't stop at a particular main melody that repeats. The Climax is at the very end and only plays for about 30 seconds compared to the half an hour of the theme. To evaluate, there is no single melody in this, which I could play to you that you will instantly recognize this symphony hence the proof that there was never a significantly memorable climax, the buildup was more important. A more Climaticly-oriented symphony would be Shostakovich's famous Waltz, Beethoven's 9th.... @Vapimyd First of all, I'm strongly against the idea that music has to be emotionaly happy or sad. Second of all, if you follow this idea then you should understand that Anti-Climatic Music has emotion behind it, just not happy or sad, depending on harmony it makes you think, remember, forget, hypnotizes or even makes you feel very indiscribably weird but good. Thirdly, and most importantly, music is art. Art adresses human senses, all art can adress the sense of love and hence this sense becomes overused and people are forgetting about the sense of hearing. Instead of hearing they become possesed to find songs which are for the heart and musicians start making songs for the heart instead of the ear yet music is the only artform that can satisfy the ear, this in my opinion undermines music's qualities by forgettign to use the elements that satisfy the ear and concentrating on the elements that satisfy the heart..

A 7/15. 3/3 points for Harmony. 1/3 for dynamics, 1.5/3 for rhythm, 1/3 for timbre. 0.5/3 for texture. u1xrNaTO1bI

Brings back memories, too bad deadmau5 never finishes his compositions and merely leaves them in beta state because he smokes too much grass. This piece has a very poor texture and pretty poor timbre. @Vapymid, ok thanks, what is the most recent progress in rock by the way?

@Vapimyd That's because they use a technique called supressing the climax. In this technique you create very long breaks for the main melody/melodies to get forgotten. However naturally if that's how music progressed in the 21st century, being completely centered on a climax and trying to make it memorable (Swing, Tango, Blues) Early, then starting to make the climax less memorable with intro and outro (Beatles Rock, Early Jazz, Early House, Early Trance), then making long pieces of breaks to make the climax even less memorable (Progressive Rock, Later Jazz) then this means the next step would be to completely try to remove the clmax or integrate it into the song. I enjoy tracks which supress the climax too, though I mainly listen to tracks from EDM not Rock. EDIT: Also in general I consider Anti-Climatic tracks those which try to break from the structure revolving around a climax not neccesarily those without a climax at all.

%_%/10 Because my rating is just as ridiculous as this track. This is how I will rate songs from now on. Musically it's a 6/15. 3/3 points for Harmony. 1/3 for dynamics, 0/3 for rhythm, 1/3 for timbre. 1/3 for texture. I also suggest others to rate similarily.... F7jSp2xmmEE

With all due respect, is this progressive rock? This music is also mostly anti-climatic, I should add it to my thread. Never mind why am I asking, this is progressive rock, and so is some of Pink Floyd.

Means that Greece's government is to step down and reform. What is interesting to me is that this guy seems like a puppet state enforcer from the EU powers as he comes directly from the ECB. Are the EU powers really going to control greece politically as well as economically soon? In other news, Silvio Berlusconi announced he is not going to run for PM again and I will quit his position in a few days as I understand because of failure to run the government properly and allowing a debt problem to arise.

I say, If it is not possible to avoid the problem, find the solution. Well, what comes to mind is to invent an artifical machine or mechanism to break down the carbon levels in the atmosphere faster then naturally. Tubes that could stick out from earth and attract carbon somehow, maybe trap it in a decomposition chamber and let out the harmless molecules on another end...

All you have to do to prove his logic wrong is ask him to elaborate in his own logic the points he states. Since he mentioned that everything has to be done in a scientific way and have evidence or otherwise you are an outright idiot he proved himself an outright idiot in his own theory as he never stated any evidence for anything he stated. Anyway I sent him a PM asking him to ellaborate his second response making him an outright idiot twice already by his own theory.

Vovochka goes to school one day with an inflated lip. - What's the deal with you? -We went fishing with my dad and a bee landed on my lip. - She stung you? - No, my dad smashed me with a paddle.

Cause this one is funnier

idozoSsHYkc Sorry I just had to comment on that lol!

Wait a second, if you believe in this shouldn't you have to provide evidence that unscientific thought is "outright idiotic" or otherwise wouldn't that mean you are "outright idiotic" since you just classified unscientifc thought "outright idiotic" without evidence to support it. I don't care if you are intelligent or not, you are still a jerk, we are not debating your intelligence here. Personally I was merely humoured at your post because it was basically 100 % insult 0 % explanatation/content. I rarely ever stumble upon such idiotic comments. Personally, I would have given you a - rep more because you didn't provide any explanation nor content and because of the uselessness of your post. The least you could is state that it is "your opinion" or that "you believe that". But you didn't even bother. What do you expect

That's exactly how I had it in mind and we are doing that right now.... ABG: I don't know specificly but... air plane bomb?

Right... that was a dumb question.

How the hell would the person know if he is right though, I had an idea using spoilers but that seems to easy to cheat on...

Yes you are supposed to wait, I thought it was self-explanatory however if someone devises a better system let me know. ABG was right, it's a Tardigrade on moss hence it's his turn.

A cheap and good gpu capable of running games like half-life 2 at least could really boost really boost the market for AMD.

Installing Synergy

I always wanted to ask: What's the damn second half????

Self explanatory, one guy posts a picture of something and the others try to guess what is in it, the person who replied correctly puts the next picture on. I know you can just go follow the image link and attempt to cheat by looking at url or fooling around with it, but what can I do, anyway you could post pictures with a non-hinting url. Rules: So here we go:

I love 17th-18th century stuff 9/10.

Isn't that where Christian Bale plays a guy who acts like a woman?????

I also enjoy skipping..... Does that make me a shemale or am I still considered a pseudo man?