ProHypster

I just found out he actually is a spam bot, but I'm still interested in where the hell that text comes from!

That's right I'm being extremely random and bringing a topic back from 3rd page, but the guy here clearly asks where these lines come from. He's not a bot. "Откуда эти строки? не знаете?" Means: where do these lines come from? anyone know? And you evil forum wizards banned him

Random Troll ftw

And now my response in your way: Natural Selection theory in general disregards facts in favor of faith. Exactly It starts when they question religion as it puts them in an unfavorable position as a "slave to God" of course. The word of atheism first spreads around when some "sad but trying to be cool" kid offers something naughty to a monotheist and then convinces the person that there is no god so the person shouldn't worry about anything. Evolutionists are raised in an environment where they are encouraged to be free and feel powerful over everything and to accept those values without thought. Over the years the person will feel free and powerful in the universe (without god of course) and forgets about god but secretly knows he exists and is afraid of him. why do these evolutionists allow themselves to be tricked? It's easier to be an atheist then a monotheist. Say what you will, the natural selection theory is a poison. Now, your reaction to this post is exactly as is mine to yours.

Some great game it is

Right except 1. I was an atheist before I became a monotheist and my mom and dad are not very religious. We come from the parts of the Soviet Union where 70% of people were atheist. 2. Germany is one of the most scientific countries in the world and teaches religion as a mandatory subject. 3. Atheism is also a religion. Check and mate.

I don't see how being taken over by Brazil improved Petrobras any. Sure, Brazil is now running a lot of things on ethanol instead of oil and gas, but we've already seen that ethanol really isn't as good a solution as had been claimed. Oh, and now Petrobras is going to do even more deepwater drilling... in the Gulf of Mexico. Far deeper (and hence, more dangerous) than that well that blew last year. And the US is loaning them the money ($2 billion) to buy the equipment to drill with. It's not taken over by Brazil... 36% remains private as I understand. What would you recommend then?

Same goes to me Alyxx, just happens to be that I don't have any mainstream left.

Here's my nickel to the atheists: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_religion Religion is science. I know I said I was going to bomb with arguments (by which I meant I was going a write a full scientific statement with research) but I came home tired and sleepy, and besides considering proof as other articles written on the internet isn't very healthy.

Making a weapon possible? Edit: I can't start the game it goes to some print options when I click the play icon...

...???? I don't even care about poetry or meaningfullness or singers in a song. I don't see why anyone should either, music is like art, you shouldn't treat it as something to give you a message but rather as a meaningless picture you like to stare at and enjoy. (Except with ears) I mean as long as the music is good to my ears and doesn't get annoying I will listen to it. Also don't you think it's a little biased when you haven't even listened to any underground stuff? I mean I have listened to mainstream (Including A-HA and Depeche Mode yes) for 2 years at one point in my life.

I don't get it, I don't like mainstream because it's melodies get annoying after time.... I tried to find better mainstream songs but 95% of them still get annoying. Why is that wrong.

I think both should be taught in school, and we as sentient beings should be allowed to choose for ourselves what to believe and respect each other's philosophies. Peace comes from mutual understanding, and I think having a good moral compass is what keeps us from going to war with each other. I'm not going to write too much more in this topic though, I've shared my opinion and that's all I can do. I'm not here to convert anyone or force my views on others. Ha, I have a paradox for you. Do you respect my belief that we should not all respect each other's beliefs? lol, that's not entirely what I believe, but it's an interesting question. no, only some, paradox solved.

Nice, atheism is scientific but monotheism isn't. When I get home prepare to be bombed by arguments.

@eedobaba I will continue this debate once at home then

Finally, I don't see a point of continuing this debate, we can both just agree that there is two major theories of the world and existence and numerous other theories. But this is really one topic that depends on personal opinion aka philosophy.

Looks cool. What do you personally think of it? I might try it

I don't see how anything is going to change at all.... maybe in 30 years the countries are going to be in a better situation economically and rights and freedom wise, but I don't think they are going to be a great power in the near future....

I can't understand evolution??? You can't explain how life formed. PS: Xp for this debate.

I know, I can't just say no to the "Communist Manifesto" after reading it... And they changed their view for hundreds of years. And the results were.... World War 2, Fascism, Neo-Nazis, "Caucasian dominance theory".... First of all that's misleading to say scientists believe in evolution, if it actually is most and not many, there is monotheist scientists too. Have you checked? Secondly, these theories were taken for granted by scientists at one time: "Women are intellectually stupid", "Cocaine is healthy" by Sigmund Freud, "Communist Manifesto" theory by Karl Marx and the "Book of Economics" by Adam Smith. All those theories must be 100% right? Again, I'm not denouncing science, I'm trying to say natural selection is just as scientific (and for some less scientific) as monotheism Not in philosophy. Philosophers can turn down any theories.

There's lots of girls on the internet.... PS: I can't say that without feeling dirty

DJ Gregory - Elle

When I posted this post.

First of all thank you for your response, but, re-read my post, understand the emphasis properly and then answer if you want, I'm not forcing you. This thread is indeed very aggressive in nature so I won't think anything of you if you will. Secondly, I live philosophy, of course we may be much different from the rest of the young, aggressive sciences but nonetheless philosophy is a science too and in no way do I turn science down, I only may turn theories down with my opninion.

For those who think oil is dissapearing, remember the Arctic and the Antarctic. The only thing I'm afraid of really is that the oil preferring monopolies will fight for the last drop of oil and therefore ruin the arctic and antarctic most likely and cause othe problems, instead of trying to switch to an alternative resource. Which will most likely happen unless countries like USA start taking over the oil companies and/or force them to change like they did with Ford during World War 2.