ProHypster

First I want to say that if I am a sheepier than sheep person and that is what you believe in, it is your right. And that is why I wrote that quote here, for it to be analyzed like that. Anyways, I will have to check on the data in the following days as I don't do this type of thing in one second, also you keep -reping me yet I have only provided content EDITS: damn the stupid quote thingies

You know what smart means, it means when I take away all your electronics and supplies and food and throw you into the wilderness you will be able to survive. I believe at least 5 billion people won't.

To quote a Mel Brooks movie: "Oh, a bullshit artist!" Oh, that popular to kids/teens movie? I'm sure the 5.? billion sheep out of the 6 billion people will agree on that.

Thank you Ross Scott for your response! So now I guess we can wait a few more votes and resolve this with the mods: 1. Who here of the mods would be willing to do that? 2. How many votes, what ratio should we need?

I'm not a creationist, I'm a philosopher, I'm here to make sure no one is biased and to defend the argument of BT "Evolution shouldn't be tought as a fact"

"Was posting jerk stuff" Edit: Now this isn't evidence but common knowledge: I see people born retarded, I don't see people born smarter. 2000 years ago a genius, Aristotle existed, 500 years ago another genius, Da Vinci existed, I don't see too many geniuses replacing those due to evolution.

That looks like a mod for the original C&C Red Alert to me... + rep for analyzing that!

And a fast thinker, analyzer, double-checker, source checker and responder?

I'm assuming your here just to defend your theory danielsangeo as you reply before it is possible to even read what I posted. Ok then....

Daniel, Your own evolutionist theorists said it must have a lower rate to work. The person here is writing based on what evolutionists said must be done to achieve evolution. Imagine this: Let's assume 2+1 = 3 is the "2+1 theory", for the theory to work we need all three components 2, 1, 3. But current scientists found out that it is impossible to have the 2 so the whole theory becomes corrupt. NOW AGAIN, YOU ALL NEED TO DECIDE FOR YOURSELVES WHAT TO THINK OF THAT.

Eedobaba, can I safely assume you are from France? Or are you from Quebec? Do they teach you religion and biology mandatory? I'll bring another statement here to think about: Mutation exists, I hope everyone here agrees on that? I mean 1 in a thousand people get born retarded due to mutation in the cells. Mutation though doesn't disprove creationalism one bit. Anyways, look at the data of mutations in offspring of humans. IMPORTANT: I DO NOT WANT ANYONE TO TAKE THIS FOR A FACTUAL STATEMENT, BUT ONLY TO ASSIST PEOPLE IN HAVING THEIR OWN PHILOSOPHY ABOUT THIS MATTER link: http://www.evolutionfairytale.com/articles_debates/mutation_rate.htm To be honest I believe GOD made mutation to fool us but that is beyond our logic and it is my philosophy yet again.

Yeah, when it goes into version Beta 0.6 at least i will try it again.

Wait are you serious? That's very popular along new generation gamers who just want quick multiplayer. Don't you think along the more quality games "competing" with halo are half-life, cs, deus ex, battlefield even Unreal series... I always thought people who play halo never played any of these games seriously. Well, it's not up to me to judge though

To the Mods: Ok, so I wonder how many votes would be needed or if it is actually possible currently to realize this proposal.

@Doom Shepherd The US helped Osama Bin Laden indirectly and directly in many ways throughout many years. They had numerous chances before even the 1990's to stop him from getting power but they didn't, then they had some chances directly in the beggining of the afghan american war but also didn't take them due to the stupidity or indecisiveness of the bush Administration. Frankly, I don't care as I don't think Ukraine will ever get bombed by a terrorist in the Al Quaida, that would be just too random and pointless. But all the countries which did have trouble with these idiots should thank the US government. As for the topic, it just came to mind, I wonder if because the leader is dead, the Al Quaida will have some sort of bad ending vengeance, maybe a nucular disaster, I believe opponents of the al Quaida should actually tighten their security and send more spies instead of letting the case go now just because the leader is dead :S

I say rather that the great stuff we do (Asian Tsunami relief, Haiti Relief, pretty damn well near everywhere relief) has a tendency to get ignored. We're like that smart kid who gets all the hate for messing up the curve and is picked last for gym... until he starts doing the jocks' homework, and then he's their best friend... for as long as they need him, then he goes back to being a pariah. There's a lot of jealousy and butthurt from the has-been and never-will-be nations, as well. Aww. someone wost their widdle empiwes! Yes, we project our power. Because we CAN, and if you could, you would too. Imagining anything else is lying to yourself. (Sorry if that was a little flamey. There are just a few things that push my annoyed button.) Harsh, but some good points made. +exp.

The american rebel support during the Soviet-Afghan war is certainly not a myth.

Not to mention that he is an american product both literally and most likely due to american decisions back in 1980.

I haven't heard from Black Mesa in two years now to be honest. It's almost like the mod died. I mean look at the dates: http://www.moddb.com/mods/black-mesa/news Chances are Operation Black Mesa and Guard Duty (Reworks of Opposing force and Blue shift) and/or EP 3 will come out before Half-life 2: Black Mesa At least those released updates in 2010.

Really doesn't change much. Osama will be replaced by another Osama from there....

Well, religion defined by scholars is: 1. The belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, esp. a personal God or gods. 2. Details of belief as taught or discussed. Religion in the eyes of the buddhists is Buddhism. In the eyes of scholars, buddhism is a philosophy.

Nope, it wouldn't fit with the definition of Religion.

Guys, first of all let's clear this up with defintions so noone gets confused. Correct me if you find me wrong. Religion: Relates to the existence, nature, and worship of a deity or deities and divine involvement in the universe and human life Theism: Belief in Deities/Deity Monotheism: Belief in one deity Polytheism: Belief in many deities. Atheism: Relates to the disblief of Religion. There can be different atheists though. Implicit Atheism: Position when a person has a Belief/Educated Guess that there is no deities Explicit Atheism: Position when a person strongly rejects the existence of deities. Pesimism/Neutral Position: Relates to the position of a person when that believes that there is no decisive facts to both atheism and theism. Alright, so now let's hopefully see this thread using proper terminology unlike some others, hope I helped

Can you feel the lunch tonight? (Yes I can!) Power of lunch (That's right) When a man lunches a woman (Ehmmm...) I can't help falling in lunch with you ( ) Crazy in Lunch (...)