ProHypster

That's a perfectly good explanation, another rep. Let me test it though.

How can you believe that a man came from a monkey and believe that god made the man So you are saying the whole bible is true but Jesus crucification was made up for no reason.

I believe this could be beneficial to all those who listen to music, just post your newest discovery in music, whether it's a genre or a musician or a band or maybe a website, explain a bit of your background in music and then why you like your new discovery. People having time can then check them out. I don't have much to say about me, if you are interested I did listen to everything but since 2-3 years ago I only listen to underground House, Techno and Trance basically EDM 9The key word is underground but I don't care if it gets famous, if it started underground I will consider it)and am not willing to change, the music will probably keep me going till the end. I like it since it has a perfect balance of all four elements of music: Tone, Rhythm, Melody and Harmony and is all about music. The tracks are 5-15 minutes long and depending on genre have different stresses on music. Notable musicians include, Sebastien Leger, Chris Lake, Reset Robot, Sven Vath... etc Mostly the only website I use is http://www.Beatport.com, I never use Itunes.

Oh common, archaelogy and history can easily destroy that myth. That's a bit vague, I asked specifically, the first people who wrote it, why and who was it? Anyways whatever the response is, What if history can prove this wrong and say that it was actually the apostoles of christ who wrote it and that each one of them existed. Then that the Christ himself existed. Or would you rather still believe in evolution if those can be proven?

Now adding to the debate against evolution: Let's talk about simple mutations, a concept of evolution for now. As I understand it current scientists say that, for evolution to work there needs to be an increase of data from mutations? My controversial question is: Can a mutation actually add new data? As far as I know mutation causes a loss of information, transfers information but never increases information. Because this is a horrible response, it mostly says that sure there is no benefitial mutations but there is always hope! And I haven't found any better:

This time I agree with your whole post, rep for that

Yes, I was talking about FM, that's why I was confused and thought Bjossi wasn't even typing to me..

What if history and archaelogy can prove events that happened in the bible? You wouldn't believe in monotheism ? I think you don't need to prove the magic if you can prove the events in the bible. Can I generally ask you, who you think wrote the bible? What year? How many people?

We don't generally believe at all, we read the scientific newspaper and assume it's a fact ... But this has been observerd since the roman times when one leader would get the full support of the crowd, then the next minute another leader speaks to them and gets their full support for him. It was called "The stupidity of crowds"

No ***** way I forgot one option , vote other, I will have to change my statistics. EDIT: Thanks for the suggestion Bjossi! Didn't know that.

Wait, I'm not being aggressive here but reasonable, just trying to understand why some vote no but if you prefer it to be anonymous, sure. I just don't want someone to do it for the sake of doing it.

This is for my philosophical studies really, please vote for one option. Also you can discuss.

19. Playing hl multiplayer as an admin ban anyone for a year the first time and forever the second who doesn't refer to the weapon of the fifth category, "ambassador pineapple" as ambassador pineapple.

PoiSonSonic is right, the thing that matters is the movie not the game really, although I love Hl 1: Source if Black Mesa will be good gameplay, why not, although wouldn't Ross would have to study it a bit more and probably ruin his own gameplay of it. I would feel for him then. Also, anyone want to bet when Black Mesa will be released Before Episode 50 or after? I vote just before...in 2032

I hope that's a joke, or are you defending their actions??? And what? All I said is the truth about the PC, I mean a good gaming Pc is ten times more expensive than a PS 3 for a reason. And I can literally create a PS 3 or an XBOX out of any PC if you give me some time to tweak it, buy the console controlls....

I don't think he meant that smart kid thing serious but as an exaggeration. That would be stupid if anyone thinks that their country is right all the time

Dude, if there was one scrap of evidence for religion that was unfalsifiable and demonsterable then I would accept religion. There is not, stop making up bullshit answers. Actually the difference is not evidence, it's that religion is studied in history/archaelogy while evolution lies in biology right now. Really? Again with that? I already said multiple times that if "2" looks like "3" and is made of carbon doesn't mean the two were once "1" and should not be even the most logical thing either, it should be nothing further then what it is.

That's just being an asshole. The game is fully developed on the pc but isn't sold for it? Just so people buy those shitty consoles.... The PC has much better gaming experience and you can dock any console controlls (not to mention other goodies) into it if you want so there's really no excuse for their actions.

If you are not in europe, the place where you live was once colonized (Exception: Japan) by some european nation. The reason was geographical, social and economical as stated by attilio. You were rich but they treated you unfairly. Now either one of three things happened to your country. You fought for independence and gained it, gained the rights but lost the wealth. You got forgotten and were allowed to gain independence or was sold because noone cared about you in europe and you were an economic deficit. You fought for independence and gained the rights and then started colonizing yourself like europe, gained the wealth back with that. That's things I can say about your country even though I don't know you due to history. Now, of course that's just the basic basics and only from the european side of view.

Whoever has voted no, can they please explain themselves because if you are not I will assume that you just voted no for the sake of it.

Good to see another philosopher here! About the island and 200 humans, couldn't you just have said that flies adjust to their enemy, the human spray can (I don't know the english term) all the time. Isn't that "proof" of the basics of evolution?

Replacement? I just want the teacher to teach people that it is a scientific theory not a fact. I don't want any religious replacement ther Religion belongs to Theology.

I think I can understand your (the people against me in this debate) thinking now, let me try to understand it. Ok, so first of, Doom Shepherd said that God must be crazy if he messed with us with the mutations. Doom Shepherds thinking: Mutations made by God = God is crazy My thinking: By the most simplest and common logic even children have Mutations made by God = God is crazy, yet is our logic always right? Don't think of it as a crazy question because of your logic. Could it be that to understand why God made mutations you would need his own logic? Could it be maybe written in the bible that we will never understand God's intentions and that doesn't matter, the question is do we need to understand him or do we need to understand that he exists. Eedobaba's thinking: Computers, Faster scientific research, TV = People getting smarter My thinking: Again that is children's logic, what you need to think about is all the factors why we could be faster and more developed: - 2000 years ago it was one scientist trying to prove something all his life. He had no theoretical background, noone taught him anything in school and the tools weren't given to him by previous inventions. - Nowadays it's a laboratory of scientists trying to prove something all their life. Communication is faster and we are at the highest social level of human history with even facebook, I could go on... but the real proof here is history, look at the ages and progress in science between 400 AD and 1000 AD in Europe and look at the ages and progress in science between 300 BC to 400 AD in Europe. Seriously if you still don't get it, I can't help you. Danielsangeo thinking: Aristotle would have a tough time figuring out the computer so he must be stupid. Me thinking: This time you think of only one way, have you tried reversing it? A modern scientist would have a tough time figuring out how to make bronze with the tools given to him at that time. Aristotle was smart because everything he did, he did without any schooling whatsoever and he still could beat many graduates today in mathematical and philosophical theories. I cannot stress the fact to think a little deeper before responding.

Wilderness survival? Been there, done that, got the merit badge. That's what happens when you grow up with Army, Navy, and Marines as close relatives. Now I understand why you keep posting like that! Anyways, the point was put a man somewhere where he has no experience whatsoever and isolate him from society, see how fast and good he can adapt, how he uses his logic, that is the test, so all the Bear Grylls/Doom Shepherds would be cheating (I assume Bear Grylls is one of those tv wilderness guys)

I don't measure intelligence in animals, they are basically automated to the environment. But for humans it's a good logistics/intelligence test.