ProHypster

Ross Scoot should totally do the hazard course once with Freeman's thoughts, what do you think. Could that be the mystery episode btw?

I said, I don't want to ask them, not answer or contribute.... But really all science questions are answered, there's nothing to debate about in the science world, I'll just steal something from Encyclopaedia Brittanica

Most people, including me, think that empathy is there for control. The two main thoughts are: - Empathy is nature's way of keeping our greed to a limit. - Empathy is God's way of... well we all know. I was always fascinated by the question whether empathy is in a conflict with intelligence, what do you think?

Anyone want to comment on the ridiculous forced Ram usage with the new windows Op. systems?

I don't see what's f**ked up there, I'm going to smack my child until the age it's mature.

Ehmm, there are explanations for almost all of them. Both scientific and spiritual. Because in the end, spiritism is a scientific subject.

Banned for being the second person to ban me for being a smart guy.

Banned for telling me something that I foresaw coming.

Bringing this topic back. Dreaming the future is a big one a lot of friends experienced. Expecially dreaming death of relatives.

Fine, I'm taking this to the highest level. Excerpt from Encyclopaedia Brittanica: Check whole argument here: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/40634/atheism

The damage can also easily be modified in the skills.cfg file.

Just use logitech, all of the ones made after 2006 are good quality This one's mine: Oh, yes, it's for laptop or netbooks.

Banned for having "Hyundai" suspiciously laying in the CPU-Z Validator, suggesting them being some kind of computer manufacturer.

Fine, don't answer the question, I won't ask any more "Weak questions" here. But I don't want to ask science questions here either, boooring. @Danielsangeo Yeah I know what you mean, but I'm not going to post everything what you did and for the sake of clear communication I just said "smartest" in quotes. And, of course we aren't the most developed either, we are equally developed, but "developed" by power/influence on nature values I meant. EDIT: let's not bother clearing up every terminology untill it comes to a direct conflict where someone in the argument got the wrong term meaning. I tried to clear every important term in the begining of Atheism: Philosophicaly redundant and people still misused them and got confused.

There's no section that's wrong. Everything is wrong. It's just a bad argument, by philosophical argumentation he is providing evidence by natural selection and natural affinities rules. That is a weak argument to someone who doesn't have a logical foundation of thinking by those rules. But that's not all of it, he also definetly assumes things one shouldn't assume, the data about time and speed + how fast the transitions are can not be coded accurately but only through personal bias/prediction. And of course the three gears are nothing like real life protons, atoms, neutrons, carbon etc. The first part is why I don't accept the video. The second is why scientists don't either. EDIT: Guys, this topic was finished when Dan-95 answered my thread and we got to an agreeable conclusion, let's not start this again, all that's left in this post is Daniel challenging my post where I said that both creationalists and evolutionists have "proof" for their theory.

Well, firstly, is it a coincidence that I also don't see Ross' image??? @Bjossi Yeah I kind of hope for a minimalistic OS too, I think the problem is with an OS comes deals and sponsors and etc etc. And Microsoft has virtually all of the Manufacturing/Software industry behind them and as a partner. Hell, they even have games support through smart tactical business. Mac has some Audio software supporting them (I know that for a fact, it's not a rumour), though it's better then on Microsoft, Microsoft's audio software isn't that much worse at all, merely a bit. We can see how Mac suffers though through the countless programs which just won't run on Mac and thus don't allow you to show what you did on a Mac to the rest of the Computer world that easily, as you will have to convert the file most of the time. With this going on, we can understand why it is so hard to get into the OS business... It's all about sponsors, trade and support of software and hardware in the computer business. @Alyxx That's why the OS is named after the smallest bird in the world.

Ok, the batteries are actually a very memorable part in the training... so you probably didn't play half-lfie much did you? Remember the dark room? Security guard explaining to him? My statement stays, that he forgot what they are due to super confidence and ignorance in the training. Fits his type.

Who needs Bankruptcy when you've got Serious Topic Discussion ? (Nice for that finally being realized, thx to admins who contributed)

So, here we can talk about what people think about Macs, "Pc's" (Microsoft) and alternatives on the topic of OS (Operating Systems, do not confuse with manufacturing) What is the future of the market? Is Microsoft going down from a monopoly to a competitor? Are there any new promising companies you've heard of? How's Linux? Whatever catches your fancy with OS, talk here.

...your browser is outdated, we know.

What did you add here, that's exactly what I said.... except you converted it into a more pro-evolutionist statement EDIT: Oh sorry, misread, I though you meant "It was made by Evolutionary rules" but you said it was made according to basic biology. Although I do not see the difference. The main thing is, I personally, find the video not enough as proof. I can take it in as an argument maximum, and that argument to me is pretty weak... On the other hand I know some, other, very good arguments and proof for arguments in evolution. As I said before , I personally think there is proof in most, maybe half of evolution. EDIT2: No, but really I don't understand that argument. What kind of argument is it when I simply say: "Everything was made by God, and that is how it works in real life. Some people get born smarter, some dumber. Heaven and hell are real as you can see by my code if I type in the code on how creationalism would work, and the graph would look like this...." That is not an argument as much as a position in the creationalist theory. The whole video is just the position in the evolutionary SCIENTIFIC (yes, it's scientific, so what?) theory. FINAL EDIT: And don't give me the bullsquid that being able to eat is a good thing and not is a bad thing is all he's coded to get those graphs... there is math involved and that math is definetly made by ebvolutionary (Biology or w/e you may call it) rules

To the posters above: This is all facts that don't explain us. By the way, I found them pretty weak, but that's my opinion. I will rephrase my question then, I guess you didn't understand it. Why do we have unecessary choice? Is choice, (taking evolution as a fact) going to dissapear through evolution since choice kills nature and us

I voted yes... but really that was in frustration and not very though out.

Bump. AS you can see on the results in Misc. AF, we agreed to do this, yet none of the mods were ready. I mean, there is more and more topics every day, how much longer can we afford to wait.... Maybe someone would be willing to sacrifice their time for this holy task... (Turning to Alyxx with a puppy face) EDIT: Also, new people here, vote!

Bumping this thread up. No decision and no action yet.