ProHypster

That thing is overfed. It's still cute though.

I saw about 10 different lamborghinis in my life....

Cool story bro.....

I would never buy a Ford or the Dodge... They seem like muscle cars on an ugly frame. Almost remind me of Bulldogs, it spits a lot but isn't smarter then the other dogs nor elegant but that's what I think The Mitsubishi on the other hand, has a charm to it. Especially the Dodge Viper in my opinion the most overrated car in the world.

Let's look at it this way: Why do we even have wars? Disagreement in culture, rights, etc and the surge for power Would a smarter person disagree with us? Most likely Do smarter people want power? I think it depends on not intelligence but corruption or disagreement. See first point. Even without wars, wouldn't we vanish steadily just like post above yours if we allow a smarter human species to reproduce. Remember neanderthals? I think there is only one place for an intelligent and social species on a planet. By the way I should publish that theory with support if no one did yet . The one intelligent social species on the planet theory.

So I am not a victim IYO then...

My dad's old car is my dream car... he sold it now but it used to be red with sexy nfs underground style yellow and greensih stripes on the sides too. I just love this car, I feel like I have a connection to it... It's my dream pet.

1. I know what MAD is... in fact history is one of my favourite subjects, that sort of insulted me... MAD however, is both a defense at the level when no nukes are deployed, but once nukes are deployed it's a destruction of the world. Let's not forget this is still due to technology. (If I don't know something I will research it and/or type it here, but don't tell me to research something, because you assume I don't know. You've done that several times...) 2. Ok, let's just assume it is although I don't know how you can be so sure of that.... The best Kevlar in no way matches the best assault rifle.. The best Tank is crap compared to the best land missiles, the best fortress can be defeated by the best artillery. 3. Pollution is an indirect technological consequence, I don't care though wether it's indirect or direct, it will happen, it's not like I'm blaming technology for it, I'm just trying to see if we should prevent the indirect wether that means stopping technology in that subject or not. Or rather, since we probably won't prevent technology, it's something necessary for humans, I'm trying to see what I should tell my kids on that matter, whether I should prepare my family for this type of shit or not. And what you said about "Real life doesn't work that way" just sounds ignorant to me. Are you saying it's an impossible thing to create something smarter or better then we are? Look around you, everything invented is in one way better than us. That's the purpose of invention. Look at your computer, it can calculate much faster then you. If we make a human that's better than us in being human... well think for yourself, he will do what we will do.. just better.

My goal was bird: Random Article got me to the most boring and short page ever.... I suggest not checking it out. Ciecholewy, Chojnice County > Village > Farmers > Chicken > Bird Since this goal was boring I decided to do a second one: Duke Nukem was my goal. Random Article got me to: Catoblepas > Age of Mythology > Single Player > First Person Shooter > Duke Nukem 3d I found the second finding the second one even more boring.. -_-

I'd like to hear a verdict about this mastermind:

@Rover Thanks for posting those links, some funny stuff claims with some more serious ones. +rep.

One of my friends was a complete retard who blew my graphics card once by putting in the wrong wire in a slot on the back of the computer.... to be honest this was a few years ago, and I don't know how something like that can even happen now as I try to remember it... but I do remember that he tried to stick the wire into any slot on the back (Actually attempting to put it into any slot by force) of the pc since he thought that would solve the lag problem of a game.... I also remember that after that the electricity of the apartment went down, so I'm guessing he put a wrong wire in the Power supply.... -________________- Since that day I never allowed him to come to my apartment. This was in Germany by the way.

I'm sure that, by the time we perfect it to that extent, we'll also be able to "get out of it", as it were.... like I said earlier, if they build a better mouse, we build a better mouse trap. Remember: Just because they advance doesn't mean that we won't. The problem is, we my not be fast enough for the solution and then the other problem is wouldn't the clone make his own solution to that solution?????? And we would lose in the end since he is smarter or "more advanced". As for examples were we did something that harmed us before inventing the counter. 1. Nuclear weapons, if someone launched one now we still have slim chances of countering it and that's 50 years or so after invention. 2. Weapons in the army do not keep up with the armor in the army generally. 3. Pollution still cannot be reversed artificially after 200 years or so of invention of pollution.

Those scream jokes always give me bad imaginations... please... stop, stop the madness. On DasBoshit, they do know how to film for sure, and even if they're jokes are sometimes silly or immature, it doesn't mean the producer is dumb. Everyone can get to silly or immature jokes once in a while. Overusing them in my opinion is wrong.

Banned for not capitalizing "that" or "guy".

What you guys seem to forget is the perfection of DNA concept. What if scientists could make a DNA (By altering the human DNA) that is much smarter then us by altering the genes, or something that can live much longer then us? Or something that can't get any diseases or when it's wounded, it heals itelf very quickly. IS the counter weapon going to be even more powerful altered DNA? What if our experiment outsmarts pretty badly... it knows how to destroy us or survive for a long time... How are we going to treat it... as a human... or a clone? The effect on morality is one thing I'm afraid of the other is that this shit could really be a danger.

I am convinced that it's not the mystery episode, this is not an episode and watching the progress bar, this wold be done in one take and wouldn't need any sound editing, filming, and all the things on the progress bar.

If you are visiting Ukraine through an international airport, trust me, you will visit Kiev . And Pripyat is about 70 Km from Kiev! I have to warn you about one thing.... the airport is still from Soviet times so you might find it and the atmosphere bit... small and primitive... There is only one exit lane, so at the exit people surround it like the red carpet.... Also don't be scared of statues of Lenin. lol... And open communists with red flags.

Alright, so that's cool, since we discussed our own theories and the big bang a lot now, let's stick to putting new theories here, if anyone has any. Like the entropic ( ) force theory. Anyone else have suggestions, feel free to post, explain the view. We all just want to know the truth, progress our own philosophy or me personally, just thinking about it is enough. Sorry for acting like the guy who made the topic Dan

Damn, if these guys ever visit Ukraine, I would love to go to a bar or a club with them.

Hmm, well I only worked with the GoldSrc engine.... I'm sure others can help with points 1-3. However the last point, in GoldSrc you need to use the entities scripted_sequence or ascripted_sequence, check how to use here: http://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Scripted_sequence Place an NPC entity then place the Scripted_sequence entity where you want him to stand/walk/run to (If you want him to be at a fixed position) or just choose none in the "Move to" section of this this sequence and then just make him face a target (Use the Y X Z Circular tool with the line to the right of the properties of this entity)and make him repeat the "shooting action"... don't forget the override AI. Sorry if this is outdated and in Source it's different, then I just wasted your time, but I think the sequences are done very much the same.

Good to see a german here, herzlich wilkommen zu dem forum ! Your theory is very close to mine at the current moment To WonSul, you are saying that our universe came from unstable conditions. But unstable conditions are just a condition of something, not the "something" and unstable conditions aren't able to make something themselves, there needs to be an ingridient of everything in our daily world, including movement, gravity, progression, time... If you don't believe there is a cause in the universe or have no reason to belive there is a cause behind the universe, then I understand, you can be atheist. To all folks who do have a theory and acknowledge a cause, a reason and movement somewhere of the world, I did my research, guess what, you are a theist even if you think you are atheist because a real atheist doesn't believe in any causes. It's a motto of "shit happens" (Not to mock, just a joke phrase)

It's not necessarily so, take this very popular philosophical monotheist consideration: http://monistic.askdefine.com/ Check out that site, you may find yourself to be a monotheist after all I'm guessing a henotheist maybe? That's enough for today. As I said earlier, I believe a lot of atheists just don't know the true position of atheism very well. By the way my agnostic-atheist friend is considered an actual atheist, he doesn't apply to any monotheistic doctrines or philosophies.

Remember God is only called so in the christian bible because the god in the christian bible doesn't reveal his name. So ultimately, I think you just don't understand that god isn't a bearded man. Simply said an atheist doesn't only not believe there is a bearded man but also has to not believe: Choose official definition of God: 1. as a powerful, human-like, supernatural being, or as the deification of an esoteric, mystical or philosophical category; 2. the Ultimate, the summum bonum, the Absolute Infinite, the Transcendent, or Existence or Being itself; 3. the ground of being, the monistic substrate, that which we cannot understand, etc.

You sort of remind me of an agnostic-atheist philosopher here (In Ukraine)... We always play chess and have some coffee over these discussions. Alright, have a good night's sleep there.