ProHypster

I'm alive and in this world. Odd.

House Music... I love it.

I think you are forgetting gay vocailists, they have a distinctive characteristic to their singing. Anyway, I prefer vocals that are mastered by the producer rather then a pure vocal. And I often prefer speaking or no vocal at all. Something like this: (Sorry Low quality) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxeVLFmN2oQ&feature=related (Not the full version and low quality) (You should know this vocal, Classic)

Wrong Thread .... But, in other terms, if my theory is true, this makes it much, much harder to find out how our universe was created and gives us infinity possibilities, maybe we won't even have time to find out.

Did someone here post uncencosred boobs or what???? RIP Real Boobs Thread, loving father of many pictures, of them some I personally posted here

I have a new theory. There is no logical explanation of the point of this universe and how it was created.

I think you misunderstand european culture. The elderly are the ones that are content and mannered. The youth in europe though, unlike many places, is very active and pushes away from their parents traditions, they have their own culture, for example remember the Acid House race movement? Techno Love Parade Movement in Germany? Recent Youth Reforms in Netherlands?. Whether it is art, politics, and in sad occasions thiefing and anarchy, it all demonstrates that the youth in Europe is active and has a voice and freedom. All this really shows, is that the country is liberal, secular, active. It can happen anywhere. Remember Canada over the vancouver loss in hockey? So in a way this is assurance that Britain is part of those countries. What this is, is the price of freedom and secularism, form your opinion yourselves.

My state of mind about this topic is still "Wtf is this?" and how the hell did it get 400+ posts -________-

Liking has nothing to do with it, nor does "getting into the genre" as you put it. He specified "love" and "hate" as two absolute sides, without any other options. And I corrected him after his post, if you care to look I'm pretty sure right now the most common type of trance is progressive and tech-hype-mixed with other genres, trying new stuff. Well, the chillout genre, to put it properly, is fine when it's mainstream. The genre is one of the easiest to produce acutally. You just write those melodies that come to your head and there is no technicality involved so there usually is not much that can go wrong in the process, hence there is no bad chillout track. They are all equally fine for their purpose. This track bothers me all the time, every time I listen to it I love the melody and harmony, but the general structure I really don't like. And every time I try to search for a decent remix for it I fail to find one. It's sad, I really would love to see a full, nice and my taste of dub structured track made out of this... . In the meantime I don't bother to ruin my taste for it by overlistening to it.

That just means you like it but you have no time to get into the genre you are busy with other genres

I will have to reply to this one with this: EDIT: Zakalac, I see your avatar, what'ya talking about, House music is not dead, just gotta keep searching :0

Yeah cool tunes, I have the gareth emery track since about 2 years ago. Although I really got confused why you chose the cosmic gate remix over the original, in my opinion much better and all time classic. In my mp3 for about a year since I discovered it !! But I disagree, It's not love it or hate it. If you listen to the tracks you WILL like/love it. If you don't bother to listen to it properly, you won't obviously. Everyone gets confused by trance melodies at first, but then comes the understanding and appreciation Also, sadly, quality underground trance is almost completely dead (Thanks to people like Simon patterson, arty, daviel kandi... sometimes W&W it's still alive though imo) Here are several tracks I love... Makes me puke to see the amount of fucking views these super high level pieces of art got. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AH89vXsThn4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvc2O6EHllM (Yes it's scooter, the wasted talent, but this one's amazing)

Depending on tech level of course... Wake up. Do whatever. (maybe go get food) Eat breakfast. (stored food probly) Do whatever. (maybe go get more food) Eat lunch. (stored food probly) Do whatever. (maybe go get more food) Eat dinner. (stored food probly) Do whatever. (maybe go get more food) Go to bed. Usual method of gathering food would be hunting, farming, or trading stuff for food. I like it . The only downfall would be, who the hell would manufacture/invent advanced/improved technology then (Like the PC) . I've thought about it after a tennis match. It seems to me this life will actually be achieved when we create robots that can manufacture things for us themselves. At first we will still need a bunch of people for supervision/repairs/maintenance but after we create robots for these jobs too, that will probably the farthest the human ever went. At that point we won't need governments/money. Then the only purpose of humans will be creating art... the only purpose I need. Of course, hopefully by that time humans develop a system against any madmen's attempts to take over the world with robots by having world defence robots. In theory, this means humans will survive as long as the planet earth's climate will. A problem is that if other science advancements in biology for example will be invented first, then it might be too late to practice this system as those advancements may change human life forever in a negative way.

Michael Archer is living propaganda whether he admits it or not. His definitions always get twisted for his own purposes. This isn't the first time. Also, there is not going to be an agreement in this thread due to cultural differences, I think I posted that 10-20 pages ago and you cannot simply go on a forum and change a person's culture by telling him how your culture is better than his. There is no evidence or argument that can make people think otherwise here, it all comes down to whether you think abortion is killing or not, and since the word kill is not a well defined word all your arguments are going to be about using the word kill to your advantage. Very primitive.

I tend to disagree, the world is rather insane, then sane (At least with our thinking capability). There is much more things done that don't make sense then those that do. In this way, the accused has not done anything out of the ordinary, BUT, the social world for most countries works only if these people get punished, and he knew that in his coutry they do, so in all fairness he shall be punished. But anyway, my point of the post was that I think that people who try to answer the answer "Why" and then become just as disturbed as you say are those that are not ready for the truth of the world/ acceptance of the theory that the world is bizzare. The people who do know or theorize the world is a rather bizzare and illogical place don't get disturbed by these news or by thinking out the question why he did it. (such as me) @Doomshepherd Tons of people or shall I call them Neo-Nazis kill or get involved in fights with muslims in Europe already, however, they did not get so much attention as this guy hence I must come to the conclusion that by his own ideology he did a better job. And as said before, in his view these people were traitors. Who do people hate more, the traitors that went to fight for the enemy or the actual enemy. The answer is here:

Also post your video card since that is 99% of the controlling factor for games and simulators. I disagree, I believe the determining factors are (~40%) Processor, (~40%) Graphics Card and (~9 %) Ram Memory. (~1 % rest). Just go to the site canyourunit.com

my favourite colour right here:

I voted for if he ever wanted to be. But for now J.C. can stay Just Cool.

Noob - Think of griefers, trolls, etc. I believe "newb" is the word you were looking for. They are not the same ?

It's heavy coding. Just kidding, go to UCP control room and go to "my signature" at the left side. Also Epsilon, that guy looks like a creepy pedophile rather then a cheery person I believe you wanted to show. EDIT: It would definetly not work as an avatar, it's too big. Also, this topic smells like noob.

Not everyone is a psychologist like you zakalak

Not everyone here is 1337 like you Zakalac.

Ravel is a conductor and revel is the verb for pleasure. But I knew what you meant so it's entirely a-ok bru. Weclome. The funniest thing is you misspelled welcome in your post MUAHAHAHAHA.... oh it's on purpose... Moving on....

We have a bunch of CSI shows but I never watch them, lol, never mind my picture response then.

Actually I did know what this is. I can't really watch through the entire thing, It's 22 minutes. Lob forbid you enjoy an entire Symphony by Tchaikovsky, they're usually 11 minutes per movement and have four movements each. Blue is right here, patience is actually key to harmonical pieces. We hate waiting naturally but in music sometimes what seems to be a boring begining or break can turn the song into an incredibly good piece in your memory. This works in the way that during the break and begining we have no clue of an upcoming melody or rhythm. It is sort of like taunting the listener, but is aimed to preserve good memory of a track and for anti-aging (They age slower, meaning, get boring much slower or never) Otherwise imagine a song compiled of four minutes of the the same melody. It is a rush that goes away fast and get on your annoyance after that. Almost like a strong drug with strong side effects. While the other is like a meal of rice with no side effects, when you are done you will feel full and happy. Also I prefer Stravinsky's pieces.