BTGBullseye

Hey, if it's anything about me, by all means voice it... I don't get offended that easily.

That's no fun. Besides, I do mention it when I buy games. OT: Feeling light headed, except for my entire body. (it's from the drugs I'm taking to mitigate some sinus problems)

+1

I have 4 full computers lying around, 2 are just obsolete boxes, (one still has a label saying it was $1600 for a Pentium@75MHz) the other 2 are obsolete laptops from IBM that were used for a small business. (I still haven't gotten around to clearing them off and installing Linux) I plan on making the laptops into mini servers for Minecraft, if they can handle it. (they should be able to, if I can find a version of Linux that works right on them)

Ah, sorry... Was looking at some sort of state data on another site, I think... Will update the post. https://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/contrib.php?id=N00000528& Most of his funding is coming from Universities, various tech companies, and various government entities. (and how the heck did he get $11,207 from the US Postal Service?!?)

All about numbers, and how 21 is so integral to them all. Lethal Weapon.

"Come here you..."

Ponderer.

Is working on catching up to Alyxx and my post counts...

Minor.

Torrenting a game, and deciding what else to do with my short evening.

But I like Pogs!

This is not true. Sanders gets most of his money from small, private donations. The list you're looking at omits those private donations, and is all his lifetime donations rather than what he's received specifically for the presidential election. This guy's average donation size is $27. Actually, I was looking specifically at his 2016 campaign donors... Over 80% of his 2016 funding is coming from Unions.

Just started torrenting that game... Looks interesting. OT: OcAlu4S-BvI Unless you're talking game trailers only, in which case I currently have none.

+1 I take it that the other laptop is not the same exact hardware? If so, then your assumption is incorrect in ruling out W10 being the culprit.

Well, I just got an interesting look at the campaign financing for the candidates... 1. Trump. The most likely Republican to win. Also has the lowest funding of all [possible to elect] candidates on either side, and seems to be nickeled and dimed to his current finances. (apart from his own personal $17m input, he has the lowest maximum donation of any candidate) The majority of his (non personal) funds are from small business. Total campaign funds: ~$27.4m. 2. Clinton. Has the most money, and most of that has come from investment firms and people that are linked to being part of the cause of the 'financial crisis'. Total campaign funds: over $188m. 3. Sanders. The majority of his money is coming from various Universities, tech companies, and the US government. Total campaign funds: ~$96.3m. 4. Cruz. Most of his money is coming from investment firms. (the same ones that took bailout money) Total campaign funds: ~$96.5m. 5. Rubio. Lots of big donations from companies with a history of questionable business practices. (like Oracle and several hedge fund corporations) Total campaign funds: ~$69m. 6. Kasich. Funds primarily coming from banks, and bank holding companies. Total campaign funds: ~$15.4m. Also, Trump has the honor of having the most money spent to target him in a negative light. (over $35m, about 10x the amount spent on any other candidate) [EDIT] Corrected for inaccurate information in relation to Sanders funding.

Is on this forum.

8/10

-bYAQ-ZZtEU

-bYAQ-ZZtEU

Watching this... -bYAQ-ZZtEU

Star Trek Online.