My Little Pony:FiM

[Mr. ShinyObject]

Answer to both questions: Derpy Hooves.

[Pinkie Pie]

Pinkie.

 

Ninja'd by a false answer.

[Doctor Felix Whooves]

Actuly I think it would be Rarity

[Srake]

Negative Fluttershy

[Mr Nutt]

Derpy's boss, you can tell he puts up with way too much stupid.

[Twilight Sparkle]

Pinkie, for sure. She may seem happy, but she DOES have some pretty obvious instabilities, and they aren't even buried all that deep. She's a good pony but there is plenty of reason to worry for her mental psyche.

[alphabetagamma]

No, no, no. It doesn't work like that. There's no pony psychological disorders, mass murders, wars, or anything of the like. The ponies are 99% dopamine, 1% magic. And it doesn't give them Schizophrenia. The end.

[Dr. Derpy Hooves Ph.D]

Come back to AF after remembering I haven't visited in a few days, and now we have 2 extra name changes.

[Pinkie Pie]

No, no, no. It doesn't work like that. There's no pony psychological disorders, mass murders, wars, or anything of the like. The ponies are 99% dopamine, 1% magic. And it doesn't give them Schizophrenia. The end.

Unicorns can be considered more than 1% magic, right?

[Chuckthe2nd]

I do indeed expect Derpy to lose it. As for a favorite, I am torn between Rarity and Rainbow.

[Kirkreng]

Pinkie Pie is fav pony. As for most interesting character, I would say Rarity.

[Dr. Derpy Hooves Ph.D]

Favorite pony: Rainbow Dash

Best pony: Pinkie or Flutter

[Mr Nutt]

My best pony and favourite pony are the same, Twilight Sparkle!

[alphabetagamma]

No, no, no. It doesn't work like that. There's no pony psychological disorders, mass murders, wars, or anything of the like. The ponies are 99% dopamine, 1% magic. And it doesn't give them Schizophrenia. The end.

Unicorns can be considered more than 1% magic, right?

Possibly, but using the equation Friendship=Magic, we can derive Friendship+Magic=Total FriendshipMagic, meaning that the more standard magic a pony has, the less friends/friendships. Treat it like a mass energy equivalence.

[Doctor Felix Whooves]

WoW math in an MLP:FIM thread

[Michael Archer]

I'm going to screw up your equation. Sorry guys:

 

The axiom we have is that "Friendship is magic[/i]. But how do we know they're interconvertible? How do we know that "all magic is friendship?" "Newts are salamanders", does not mean that all salamanders are newts; the statement should read "all newts are salamanders, but not all salamanders are newts." Likewise, "all friendship is magic, but not all magic is friendship."

[Doctor Felix Whooves]

... W T F is this really happening, are we really trying to solve the math of magic ?

[Pinkie Pie]

I love your reaction to the apparent taboo of overthinking MLP. As evidenced by Blue, it's apparently a pretty common occurence.

[alphabetagamma]

I'm going to screw up your equation. Sorry guys:

 

The axiom we have is that "Friendship is magic[/i]. But how do we know they're interconvertible? How do we know that "all magic is friendship?" "Newts are salamanders", does not mean that all salamanders are newts; the statement should read "all newts are salamanders, but not all salamanders are newts." Likewise, "all friendship is magic, but not all magic is friendship."

Not all magic is friendship, some magic may be 'normal' magic, like Twilight's. So it's possible for all ponies to have equal amounts of magic, but some in the form of friendship.

 

Or, there is one possibility that seems more likely, devised by the greatest minds of our time,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mjcOZf1BfU

[Srake]

Magical friendship is cool and all but the real question is whether circles and squares can exist in the same universe.