This Might Be Controversial: Climate Scientist Gives Take On Future

[DreamHollow4219]

This is the video since I can't seem to link it any other way.

Edited May 5, 2021 by DreamHollow4219 (see edit history)

[FullBusinessSuit]

Why is it always childless atheists that reeeee the hardest about climate change?

 

Of all people they have the least incentive to care, and no one should listen to them? Why do they reeeee the hardest?

[Deep Dive Devin]

4 hours ago, FullBusinessSuit said:

Why is it always childless atheists that reeeee the hardest about climate change?

 

Of all people they have the least incentive to care, and no one should listen to them? Why do they reeeee the hardest?

People already gave you plenty of answers to this dumb insult and you refused to accept any of them because you would rather self-fellate your own ego than listen to anyone.

[StrixLiterata]

12 hours ago, FullBusinessSuit said:

Why is it always childless atheists that reeeee the hardest about climate change?

 

Of all people they have the least incentive to care, and no one should listen to them? Why do they reeeee the hardest?

That's a blast from the past. And wrong too: the scientist who posted the video, Paul Beckwith, is married with children, as you can read in the 7th paragraph of this page https://paulbeckwith.net/about/

To quote "Paul is a father, a long time husband, an avid cottager and boater"

[Im_CIA]

On 6/4/2021 at 1:35 AM, FullBusinessSuit said:

Why is it always childless atheists that reeeee the hardest about climate change?

 

Of all people they have the least incentive to care, and no one should listen to them? Why do they reeeee the hardest?

It's because they want to project being biological dead ends onto the rest of humanity.

 

Climate Change is real though, but what of it? Nothing I can't handle.

Edited June 8, 2021 by Im_CIA (see edit history)

[FullBusinessSuit]

Please don't post angry comments here. You know who you are.

 

On 6/7/2021 at 6:54 PM, Im_CIA said:

Climate Change is real though, but what of it? Nothing I can't handle.

Looks like the childless atheists have been defeated here. Global warming isn't anything i can't handle either.

 

Maybe you're on to something. Atheists are just pussies who can't handle global warming. Maybe they should do like Disturbed and FUCK OFF AND DIEEEEEEEE!!!!!!

 

Explanation as to why childless atheists who have the least incentive of any demographic in the world to care reeeeee harder than people with children about global warming or shut your pseudointellectual mouth!!!!!

[FullBusinessSuit]

On 6/4/2021 at 11:50 AM, StrixLiterata said:

That's a blast from the past. And wrong too: the scientist who posted the video, Paul Beckwith, is married with children, as you can read in the 7th paragraph of this page https://paulbeckwith.net/about/

To quote "Paul is a father, a long time husband, an avid cottager and boater"

Therefore this single example (that I will not be researching nor clicking your link) turns everything on its head!! Ahhh the fallacies of a pseudointellectual atheist who wishes to become kind tyrant one day and force his new religion onto the masses.

 

You still haven't explained why childless atheists reeeee the hardest about climate change. They have the least incentive to care.

 

For every inflammatory post that does not answer this question directly I will dump a garbage bag of trash into my local park.

[Im_CIA]

53 minutes ago, FullBusinessSuit said:

Please don't post angry comments here. You know who you are.

 

Looks like the childless atheists have been defeated here. Global warming isn't anything i can't handle either.

 

Maybe you're on to something. Atheists are just pussies who can't handle global warming. Maybe they should do like Disturbed and FUCK OFF AND DIEEEEEEEE!!!!!!

 

Explanation as to why childless atheists who have the least incentive of any demographic in the world to care reeeeee harder than people with children about global warming or shut your pseudointellectual mouth!!!!!

Even though I agree in principle, I don't really confront anyone about it because it's just self-serving gratification. I'm positioning myself to be a post-apocalyptic warlord, so getting mad at my future subjects won't accomplish anything 

 

Just worry about yourself man. You're the one reeing the hardest in this thread. 

[FullBusinessSuit]

1 hour ago, Im_CIA said:

You're the one reeing the hardest in this thread. 

Why, why then I'd better stop roasting these <adjective> atheists....

 

Nah. The answer dodging in this post is proving something to the world that isn't in the open.

 

1 hour ago, Im_CIA said:

it's just self-serving gratification. I

Nah. You're psychologically projecting. And your thought process in an individualist americanism. COmment discarded.

[Im_CIA]

13 minutes ago, FullBusinessSuit said:

Why, why then I'd better stop roasting these <adjective> atheists....

 

Nah. The answer dodging in this post is proving something to the world that isn't in the open.

 

Nah. You're psychologically projecting. And your thought process in an individualist americanism. COmment discarded.

Yeah, you sure showed everyone. No one will ever recover from this epic stumping

[Deep Dive Devin]

8 hours ago, FullBusinessSuit said:

For every inflammatory post that does not answer this question directly I will dump a garbage bag of trash into my local park.

Does that mean you'll stop dumping them on the forum?

[StrixLiterata]

18 hours ago, FullBusinessSuit said:

I will not be researching nor clicking your link

thanks for admitting you're misinformed

[StrixLiterata]

18 hours ago, FullBusinessSuit said:

You still haven't explained why childless atheists reeeee the hardest about climate change. They have the least incentive to care.

The people who trhow the biggest tantrums abot climate change are conservatives, because they have the most incentive to care: not having to spend money on recycling, clean energy, etc.
It is you who is dodging the answer because you don't like it

 

18 hours ago, FullBusinessSuit said:

For every inflammatory post that does not answer this question directly I will dump a garbage bag of trash into my local park.

Way to show your pettyness. I can see how your religion makes you moral and wise.

[TB]

Warnings once again issued. No ad-hoc, act like an adult if you're participating in these kinds of discussions. Attack the idea, not the person.

[Deep Dive Devin]

The person is not wholly separate from the idea. You can't have a meaningful discussion with someone vocally admitting to arguing in bad faith.

 

When he says "I am not going to read anything you put in front of me", how are you supposed to attack that? So long as we're taking the values-neutral approach, this is just going to happen over and over until someone gives up the war of attrition, and it's not fun for anybody.

 

[StrixLiterata]

On 6/11/2021 at 5:53 AM, The Britain said:

Warnings once again issued. No ad-hoc, act like an adult if you're participating in these kinds of discussions. Attack the idea, not the person.

It's impossible to avoid personal attacks when arguing with FullBusinessSuit, because the idea which he proposes is that all who oppose his political and moral views do so because they're stupid or because they're hypocrites; if you have the patience, read what he wrote in his "why is it always childless atheists who REEE the hardest about climate change?" posts, and you'll see what I mean.

I would debate different opinions on how to resolve the issues we face or even what those problems are, but when the opinion being discussed is
 

On 6/9/2021 at 9:31 PM, FullBusinessSuit said:

Atheists are just pussies who can't handle global warming

then it's personal.

[Im_CIA]

4 hours ago, StrixLiterata said:

It's impossible to avoid 

It's not impossible, you just need to be more clever and refined about it

[Mira]

Better still to just not even waste your precious time. You're never going to change his mind and he himself isn't tactful enough to persuade anyone who doesn't already believe everything he says anyway. Nothing is gained from acknowledging his existence.

[TB]

26 minutes ago, Mira said:

Better still to just not even waste your precious time. You're never going to change his mind and he himself isn't tactful enough to persuade anyone who doesn't already believe everything he says anyway. Nothing is gained from acknowledging his existence.

Bingo, it's completely possible to not go ad-hoc on someone arguing in a childish manner. This goes for everyone. Simply ignore them (trolls in general). "Don't wrestle with pigs in the mud unless you get covered in filth yourself." or however that quote goes.

 

10 hours ago, StrixLiterata said:

It's impossible to avoid personal attacks when arguing with FullBusinessSuit, because the idea which he proposes is that all who oppose his political and moral views do so because they're stupid or because they're hypocrites; if you have the patience, read what he wrote in his "why is it always childless atheists who REEE the hardest about climate change?" posts, and you'll see what I mean.

I would debate different opinions on how to resolve the issues we face or even what those problems are, but when the opinion being discussed is
 

then it's personal.

See above. Everyone will get warnings and bans for it, it's not justified because someone else is doing it. There is no clause of self-defense in an online forum. No one's life is at-risk. The rules apply to everyone.

[BTGBullseye]

4 hours ago, The Britain said:

No one's life is at-risk.

We hope...