46 minutes ago, FullBusinessSuit said:Wow. You speak with such authority, and you clearly haven't been paying attention. There are mainstream uses of these microchips. Again, it's not a secret, it's not a conspiracy (that is to say a "hidden agenda" as opposed to the erroneous popular usage of the word meaning "false story"), it's already been used for a long time in the medical field first and foremost.
>crackpot
I purposely didn't cite sources to tease out just how uninformed responses would be. You don't count anymore since I said all this, but let's see what others have to say.
>will generate so much entropy it will be impossible to hide it.
That's so deep.
I'm not dismissing microchipping. It's just the scale/logistics of what you're describing here is completely bananas.
There a million different networking protocols and everyone and their grandmother has their own spin on it. A few years ago, I had to make a utility that can p2p with a x-platform app running on both ios and android. The obvious solution is to use Bluetooth, but the problem was that Apple only supported this on other Apple devices. So it had to be BLE instead which is snails pace.
So yeah, I think it's extremely unlikely that every major router manufacturer and/or Telecom company in the world actually agreed on something and came up with some standardized way of providing access points for microchips with no antennas to send data to.
Even if they did, they wouldn't be able to keep it a secret. Wireless networking isn't black magic. It's radio based and anyone can pick up on it, even if it's encrypted.