On 1/17/2021 at 8:22 AM, kerdios said:yes!
The correct answer is no.
Not even the recently fabricated, loaded term being "anonymously" injected into american liberal social media websites (all major social media sites) fits this description. I'm sure it will be redefined and then ret-conned into the history books as "always having been that way", as per contemporary american mythology.
Almost nothing is terrorism at all. The pussification of america has predisposed people to acting like cry babies and swearing at each other and trying to get the government to attack anyone who hurts their feefees (by calling them terrorists). Even the Burn Loot Murder riots weren't terrorism, and they were burning down businesses and houses and looting everything and murdering people - not terrorism. What they were doing was really messed up, and the media tried taking the events (that are actually caused by deglobalism and not someone dying while being arrested by ambiguous causes), and wrapping their own narrative around it (makes me wonder how this obvious nonsense will be written about in the history books because it's not even close to what's being talked about in the media, especially the state sponsored media outlets like CNN and Fox).
I saw close friends who never, ever EVER used the term terrorism to describe anything but actual terrorism, then as soon as the erroneously interpreted people using it to act political dissidents they tried using it to say any violent act is terrorism. They've even tried saying 2 people getting into a fist fight is terrorism - this is full blown mass-stupidity happening now in america. I never in my life so much as imagined this as a state that an entire population could be in - not even a fantasy setting or anything like that - I truly did not even think up the thought in any capacity; yet here we are living it.
I think a lot of this has to do with closing of mental institutions. When I was a child when someone was clearly acting like a lunatic, they'd *always* be taken into custody for mental evaluation and put somewhere with caretakers so they weren't freaking out the general population. It was rare, but it happened, and when it did, it was taken care of. Now, police show up and have the sane person concede something to the mentally ill person or go to jail; inverted reality. And why are the police responding to social issues anyways? But I digress, almost no acts of violence are terrorism, and definitely not "acts with a political motivation reeeeee" (this is definition made up and circulated by the radical left in america, and then injected into europe, mostly the EU countries, and it's opening the door for causing actual terrorism to be ignored).
QuoteAlso, just wait until NaPoVoInterco passes in enough states for some real shenanigans to start
idk what that's about, but I'm not clicking a video that leads to youtube that is realated to politics. that social media website is clearly rampantly censoring content, especially political videos, and therefore i will not be viewing it. And i sure as hell am not watching something with djt in the thumbnail. I feel like everyone is taking a contrived polarized stance on politics nowadays, when most people shouldn't even be thinking about it. They should focus on their families - there is no need for everyone's input in a political discussion.