Everybody calm down. What I'm saying is already how mentally ill are treated and have been for my entire life. Except now it seems like these people are not kept in institutions, whereas when I was younger, that's where they were kept. And I doubt they can use computers with internet in there. There is nothing wrong with attending to the mentally ill, and RaTcHeT302 already went on to talk about the way in which they're already handled. I don't understand the outrage, and I will continue on the course of inquiring to people how the mentally ill should be dealt with when it comes to the internet.
It's already been suggested by big tech companies' executives that truly insane people should be looked at when it comes to things like allowing them to use twitter, to give their specific example. I'm only mentioning this because I'd like for respondents to avoid unwelcome personal attacks, and I'm presuming that if an authoritative figure has said something like this then that gives the folks who love their authoritative sources an excuse to jump on board. So if you'll join me, let's discuss the handling of the mentally ill online.
1 hour ago, BTGBullseye said:seems like he's gone off the deep end, and needs to come up for air...
What effect does a mentally ill woman or man have when talking in an online forum or on social media?
What effect does 100 or 1000 mentally ill people have in comparison to just one?
In general, how does one spot a mentally ill woman or man? (already assumed the response that I'm one myself. Please move on to a general answer).