Jump to content

Edit History

Isaiah

Isaiah

3 hours ago, Collapsar77 said:

...Hilariously I think you just accidentally strengthened Ross's argument while trying to explain why you don't like it.

image.png.094acfcafb5a3b1f4d271a46fe955ac2.png

I'm sorry but you don't seem to understand the formula or what I was saying. My whole point was that they are at best equally efficient according to Fitts's law, and your diagram only confirms that. However, Ross has claimed both ways are worse in difference situations, which is a contraction. Now I'm not claiming this was intentional deception and I may be wrong about the reason behind it, but none of this changes the fact the two criticisms are not only contradictory but untrue according to Fitts's law. At least in the way he presented them.

Isaiah

Isaiah

3 hours ago, Collapsar77 said:

...Hilariously I think you just accidentally strengthened Ross's argument while trying to explain why you don't like it.

image.png.094acfcafb5a3b1f4d271a46fe955ac2.png

I'm sorry but you don't seem to understand the formula or what I was saying. My whole point was that they are at best equally efficient according to Fitts's law, and your diagram only confirms that. However, Ross has claimed both ways are worse in difference situations, which is a contraction. Now I'm not claiming this was intentional deception and I may be wrong about the reason behind it, but none of this changes the fact that both positions are contradictory and false according to Fitts's law. At least in the way he presented them.

Isaiah

Isaiah

2 hours ago, Collapsar77 said:

...Hilariously I think you just accidentally strengthened Ross's argument while trying to explain why you don't like it.

image.png.094acfcafb5a3b1f4d271a46fe955ac2.png

I'm sorry but you don't seem to understand the formula or what I was saying. My whole point was that they are at best equally efficient according to Fitts's law, and your diagram only confirms that. However, Ross has claimed both ways are worse in difference situations, which is a contraction. Now I'm not claiming this was intentional deception and I may be wrong about the about the reasons behind it, but none of this changes the fact that both positions are contradictory and false according to Fitts's law. At least in the way he presented them.

×
×
  • Create New...

This website uses cookies, as do most websites since the 90s. By using this site, you consent to cookies. We have to say this or we get in trouble. Learn more.