Home to Civil Protection and Freeman’s Mind
I see a non-sequitur statement that offered no real observations of any value, followed by a stalwart refusal to explain said non-sequitur, instead opting for accusing those who didn't find said statement cogent of simply lacking understanding.
You had a bad take, dude. Just own it. It's not other people's job to give a shallow statement value and then still pretend you're right.
I see a non-sequitur statement that offered no real observations of any value and a conceited refusal to explain said non-sequitur, followed by a stalwart refusal to explain said non-sequitur, instead opting for accusing those who didn't find said statement cogent of simply lacking understanding.
You had a bad take, dude. Just own it. It's not other people's job to give a shallow statement value and then still pretend you're right.
This website uses cookies, as do most websites since the 90s. By using this site, you consent to cookies. We have to say this or we get in trouble. Learn more.
