11 minutes ago, Maroko said:It was you who made that fallacy first by bringing up how many "insecure white boys" (of course) would agree with me.
I didn't say how many at all, actually. Make no mistake, I never meant to imply your bad takes were popular.
11 minutes ago, Maroko said:Nah, I'm not really in the mood for that since you're constantly throwing ad homs, unlike me, and won't take the time like @kerdios to act civilized.
I think you are in the mood for it. Claiming my position is an ad hominem is itself a strawman of my actual take.
11 minutes ago, Maroko said:And you dare to bring up strawmanning when in every reply you've lumped my arguments with flat-earthers and the such? How old are you, honestly?
That's not a strawman, it's a sincere comparison. I am asking you to come up with a justification as to why you deserve to be listened to any more than every other dime-a-dozen racist conspiracy theorist on the internet, and you are patently refusing to do so, just because you don't happen to personally like the fact that "racist conspiracy theorist" is what you've been identified as, rather than any proper critical analysis as to why the things you're saying are actually worth saying. The idea that they could hold up to scrutiny (which, to be clear, they wouldn't) first requires the idea that you are engaging in this conversation with any sort of honesty, and with each post that is going to become harder and harder to prove. You will no-doubt critique people who disagree with you for being "uncivil", but there's never going to be civility among takes like yours. Even if people agree, that's just a decrease in civility with all of the groups you're targeting. I have no qualms with saying I'd rather side with the races and genders you hate than with you. Not only are they less-likely to be like you, there are a lot more of them.