A message from anonymous

[Flyingamerboy]

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CEAQtwIwBA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D6Y6H_dDTisg&rct=j&q=anonymous%20operation%20paparazzi&ei=HfmuTu_vDYWa8QOnwOCwCw&usg=AFQjCNELmaBVep68MJtJel3dSj8QJURthw

[Koach]

totally agreed. if i had a camera, free time, 18 years old and a good event to film, im pretty sure i could get some nasty pics/clips.

[Collective Foal]

It's a good message to get out there, but you don't have to spam it everywhere, dude.

[Flyingamerboy]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-u_4FTVg5fs

Spread the message.

[Doom Shepherd]

My videocamera commands me to videotape jagoffs wearing Guy Fawkes masks doing stupid things. Guy Fawkes didn't really give a shit about freedom in a sense, he just hated the king of England and loved himself some pope. Its like choosing the false history of the comic book "V for Vendetta", over actual history to be some kind of symbol for their cause.

 

Screw Anonymous.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqDT6GLO8zw

[Axeldeath]

8|

[Doom Shepherd]

8|

 

Yes, I know I was using 4chan speech. It was intentional, since Anonybous and /b/ are practically inseparable.

The Devil can quote scripture for his own purpose.

[The Hamburglar]

People still use the stupid Guy Fawkes mask?

seriously?

are we 12 again?

 

ANON IS LEGION LOL EPIC WIN XD

[Kirkreng]

How funny that you mention Gunns, I was just about to post this:

062pX2yTKVc

Opinions?

[Koach]

i just realized why they're gonna take down facebook on november 5...

 

its the bonfire night, aka the night of Guy Fawkes.... it all makes sense now.

[Kirkreng]

Couldn't they do something a little more....... spectacular? I mean, Facebook...really?

[ProHypster]

Youtube, BBC, CNN internet domains would be an appropriate choice. Or Google itself.

[Kirkreng]

The thing is anonymous, unlike lulsec, don't randomly attack websites or corporations. They have a reason, what is their reasoning behind attacking Facebook?

[Obsidian]

Couldn't they do something a little more....... spectacular? I mean, Facebook...really?

 

I thought the same thing when they attacked the PSN. All they succeeded in doing there was loosing the support of many PS3 gamers for their "just" actions.

[ProHypster]

The funny thing here is that I use vkontakte instead of facebook which has essentially the same features + more.

So basically I won't be affected at all .

[Doom Shepherd]

Youtube, BBC, CNN internet domains would be an appropriate choice. Or Google itself.

 

Attacking Warner Music Group would make infinitely more sense than attacking YouTube. YouTube carries anonymous's videos, but WMG gets anything with the slightest bit of sampling from their artists removed, completely ignoring Fair Use.

 

But Anonymous is not good for anything really useful. which is why they won't touch WMG.

[ProHypster]

Yeah, I tend to agree, anonymous seems like a bunch of hackers with too much time and a challenge.

[Flyingamerboy]

The thing is anonymous, unlike lulsec, don't randomly attack websites or corporations. They have a reason, what is their reasoning behind attacking Facebook?

I heard that they were attacking the fox news website but that individual members of anonymous could still be attacking facebook.

[Flyingamerboy]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixoPgMhghZo

March of anonymous.

[Doublenature]

Anonymous=a bunch of attention whores.